Criteria 2 - ASM IPS

Criteria 2

2.1.1 – Enrolment Number- Number of students admitted during the year

  1. Eligibility Number List
  2. EOA Report

2.1.2 – Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats)

  1. DTE Merit List
  2. Information Brochure
  3. Reservation in admission Act 2006
  4. Reservation Policy
  5. Seat filled against reserve
  6. Seat Matrix

2.2.1 – The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners

  1. Policy and Execution Process
  2. List of advanced learners and slow learners
  3. Profiling Form
  4. Remedial classes

2.3.1 – Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences

  1. Industrial Visit Report
  2. Sample Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation
  3. List of SIP Students

2.3.2 – Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.

  1. Blog Created by faculty members
  2. Classrooms with ICT enabled facilities
  3. LMS MS Team by Microsoft
  4. Sample PPT
  5. YouTube Channels created by faculty members

2.3.3 – Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other relatedissues (Data for the latest completed academic year )

  1. Circular of Mentor Mentee
  2. List of Mentor Mentee
  3. List of teachers

2.4.2 Number of full time teachers with Ph. D.

  1. Circular of Mentor MenteeList of teachers with Ph.D
  2. Ph.D Guideship Letter
  3. List of Ph.D Scholars

2.5.1 – Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode.

  1. CCE Notice & Circular
  2. Sample Teching plan
  3. Sample CCE
  4. Sample CCE Result

2.5.2 – Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient

  1. Policy to handle exam related grievances

2.6.1 – Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students.

  1. PO, CO 2019 Pattern
  2. PSO’s 2019 Pattern

2.6.2 – Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.

  1. Attainment level

2.6.3 – Pass percentage of Students during the year

  1. Result Analysis 22-23
  2. Result Ledger 22-23

2.7.1 Student Satisfaction survey

  1. Student Satisfaction survey
× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
× [contact-form-7 404 "Not Found"]
WhatsApp chat
Enquiry

ENQUIRE NOW